I saw
INCONVENIENT TRUTH last night, the documentary that follows Al Gore on the latest leg of his decades-long journey to educate the world about the threat of global warming to humanity and its home.

(You can click the pic,
here, or
here for better written blurbs on the film. =)
I pushed the movie in an earlier
blog . Please have a look at it if you haven't already. In that post I also pointed to some ads that aired as part of a pro-CO2(!?) campaign put together by the ummm... interestingly named...
Competitive Enterprise Institute.
Did anyone actually catch one of these re-educational
minutes on the telly? I am so frickin annoyed with the spin these "competitive enterprisers" (aka
ExxonMobil and friends) are attempting to put on melting glaciers and increasing CO2 levels, citing very
particular scientific research in an attempt to discount the observed
changes in weather and climate caused by
global warming.
On the other hand, it IS kind of backhandedly heartening that they feel they need to embark on this "CO2! U! S! A!" program.
After seeing the movie, I took another look at those CEI propaganda droppings, did a bit of googling, and learned that one of the cited researchers
objects to the use and implication of his study as proof against climate change.
Please go see AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH. If you're looking for someone to go see it with, well, check in with me and I'll definitely try and work it in again. =)
I was hoping for some more (
(science + nature) x economics) in the documentary, but I think now that by going light on that, the movie keeps the education on the phenomenon in focus, and very approachable and accessible. Pay attention and you'll learn some pretty remarkable things...
Do you know that we've actually succeeded in slowing down the rate of ozone depletion and
shrinking the Antarctic ozone hole? This thru international cooperation and regulation of the creation and use of products that release CFCs into the atmosphere.
This success was news to me. WTF? Why was that? Good news doesn't make the news, does it?
It once was true that we, humanity -the ants that scurry across the hide of this massive elephant of a planet Earth- couldn't do a thing to be noticed by or disturb the life of our home. We simply didn't have the power to affect the course of nature and the behavior of the world's climate. However, with the technologies at our fingertips today, in use every day by the largest and most rapidly increasing human population ever, that is no longer the case. We can impact the planet, and its most vulnerable and sensitive component, the atmosphere, in ways that were never before possible.
The scientific community acknowledges that science, data, and research all support this. However, an ad/disinformation campaign as sinister and calculated as that employed by the tobacco industry has the general public doubting. It's the skeptics' goal to get the public to attach the word "theory" to the words "global warming," even though the phenomenon is real, manifest now, and can be measured against data observed over millenia.
How is it that we are so easily manipulated?
You'll recognize how that question pertains to many different sectors of life and knowledge and belief in today's world, eh?
*sigh*
I'm rambling.
Grab some friends and GO SEE THE
MOVIE!
Keep on keepin on~
June 14. Check out some observations on polar bears demonstrating a "
brutal downside of global warming." I'm still waiting for a festive upside that doesn't resemble Lex Luthor's play for new beachfront property in the first SUPERMAN movie. Random synapse trigger - I seem to recall someone -maybe Kevin Smith?- talking about a SUPERMAN script bouncing around Hollywood for years, and some producer's input being to have Supes go up against killer polar bears... Wack.